That said, having recently (and perhaps, finally) ended a very long relationship i have to admit that when i see activity by my ex on facebook i almost always feel quite emotional: sometimes jealous, sometimes happy, sometimes i just miss her... but i always feel something. That said, i did change my profile status to single almost immediately... but this end had been a long time coming. Everyone should be aware that facebook is public, it is for meeting, socialising, gossipping, stalking etc these are it's functions in our lives. Even hearsay getting back to someone can be devastating enough. Everyone be careful in love, but have fun, but be careful... you'll be fine!
Michael Bay may be crazy but this new FiOS thing is a rapidly growing television/telephone/internet service using fibre optic cable direct your home. Apparantly they can get speeds of 50/20 mbps (down/up) which is stupid fast considering ADSL2 in the states only goes up to about 30/5 mbps. It will be interesting to see how big this gets and if their explosive advertising campaign actually does anything. (Wikipedia)
This is my last blog folks, it's been real. Stay out of trouble and remember to unplug as much as possible, it's a beautiful day outside. Peace..xo
In the current issue of Q magazine you'll find an short article on a new treaty between the world's wealthiest nations attempting to stop illegal music err... crossing boarders. The plan to make it legal to search your laptop or MP3 player for illegally downloaded, copyrighted, music with the power to fine per illegal song, confiscate the computer or player and even destroy it. The article is short because apparently no details of this treaty have been released to civil liberties groups, which stinks of foul play. It goes on to report that this may lead to increased tracking and surveillance by ISPs of what users download, upload and email.
Surveillance state any one?
While I see it as one of the most innovative and, perhaps, up to speed measures "The Man" has thought of I think it's a really bad idea. How many people do you know who went to Thailand and came back with a wallet full of pirated movies? Probably heaps, it's just another unnecessary piece of bureaucracy and regulation that the western world just does not need. Add to that any further powers the authorities may have over citizens which pose no great threat to anyone except major record labels (who are widely regarded as scheisters anyway). Increased surveillance by a nation on it's own people is almost always a bad idea, it leads to suspicion and doubt for everyone.
I have no link to this article yet as it has not been digitally published that I can find. I will keep searching though. But head to the newsagent, it's the issue of Q with Angus Young on the cover, November 2008 p20.
Yes folks, i know the anticipation has been almost to much to bare but i am back online, new computer... i hate vista.
I'm just posting the bibliography Tom and i used for our presentation in case people want to investigate more for themselves. Also feel free to contact me if you want to get into torrenting, i realise my explanation could have been a little better. You made need access to certain journals to view some of the files. Most were found through the La Trobe subscriptions but i have a feeling i found some through the State Library too.
Andrade, Nazareno, and Mowbray, Miranda, and Lima, Aliandro, and Wagner, Gustavo, and Ripeanu, Matei, “Influences on Cooperation in BitTorrent Communities,” Applications, Technologies, Architectures, and Protocols for Computer Communication, Philadelphia, 2005, accessed on 12/09/08, available from: https://portal.acm.org/
Hall, Yensy James, and Piemonte, Patrick, and Weyant, Matt, Joost: A Measurement Study, Carnegie Mellon University, 2007, accessed on 20/09/08 From: http://www.patrickpiemonte.com/15744-Joost.pdf
Izal, M, and Urboy-Keller, G, and Biersack, E W, and Felbder, PA, and Al Hamra, A, and Garces-Erice, L , Dissecting BitTorrent: Five Months in a Torrent’s Lifetime, Institut Eurecom, France, accessed on 10/09/08, from: http://heim.ifi.uio.no/~anwarah/PAM04.pdf
Kwok, James S H, and Gao, S, “Knowledge Sharing Community in P2P Netowork: A Study of Motivational Perspective”, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol 8, No 1, 2004, accessed on12/09/08, from http://www.emeraldinsight.com/10.1108/13673270410523934
Leyden, Fleur “Film pirates escape net Indecision holds up crackdown,” Hobart Mercury, 9 August 2008, available through factiva through the LaTrobe Library Website.
Svensson, Jorgen S & Bannister, Frank, “Pirates, Sharks and Moral Crusaders: Social Control in Peer-To-Peer Networks,” First Monday, vol 9, no 6, 2004, accessed on 22/09/08, from URL: http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue9_6/svensson/index.html
Taylor, Richard, under the supervision of Dr. Blake Ives, “Peer-to-Peer: Business Applications,” ISRC Future Technology Briefing, Bauer Collage of Business, University of Houston.
I would also like to make some passing comments about facebook: I went to a party some weeks ago, a "fetish" themed fancy dress party. the theme was to come as some sexual fantasy or fetish, my friend went as a sultry school teacher, there were many girls there were naught but a little black pvc and gaff tape. The party wasn't as massive as i think people thought it was going to be so i was able to overhear a lot of conversations and the one that kept coming up was "i can't wait for monday so i can see all this on facebook" - what. the. fuck. it's a party, people should be partying, not being excited about checking out photos on facebook. the memories are always what is most important, the photos are just an entertaining reminder. it seems like people are more excited about the image of themselves on the internet. friends can see how crazy and fun they are, when really the party wasn't as good as i thought it was going to be. IS our internet identity more important than our real one?
i have just started dating the most gorgeous kiwi girl, it's very exciting. i looked her up on facebook today because i finally remembered her surname (we've been getting spastic-drunk together... you forget things). i couldn't find her on facebook even though i know she mentioned that she used it so i googled her. no luck there, so i googled her name with "Auckland" (where i think she is from) and i found a photo of a 4 year old girl who i assume is her. it is an 1989 preschool class photograph with her name tagged to it. Subquestion: am i a stalker?
the internet is a weird place. speaking of which, here is a video i have been meaning to post for months. This is a youtube exclusive video for a song on R Kelly's last album "The Double Up" - this is a serious song. check it.
For the past 10 days i have been screenless. That is, my laptop is broken and my tv is broken. i use both these appliances, or instruments as i prefer to see them, everyday for both academic and leisure activities. Not having a laptop has made a lot of research quite hard, i've been forced to float between school, local and city libraries, friends' computers, internet cafes and right now i am typing on my sister's in canberra. Anywhere i can log on, you will find me checking my digital self. almost like a starving rat really, i beg for 5 minutes of use where ever i am. I have been doing a lot of online research lately, for this class and two of my sociology classes, not having a laptop to browse through PDF files is proving expensive as i have to print them all off instead of just viewing them on my screen and making notes of important passages.
in short: having both screens plucked from my life in week 7 of university, at the end of winter, when i'm barely earning any money is really, really hard to live with. I also fell quite ill last week and i have wondered if it's because of the increased stress of tearing through melbourne on my bike trying to find a 24hour internet cafe every night of the week.
Thankfully i have recently been offered a tv which i will receive later in the week and someone has offered to lend me their laptop while they travel overseas for three weeks so there is hope i can stay, not only on top of my school work, but manage my screen addiction for just a little longer.
I feel i should clarify some comments i made at last week's lecture, as i feel they may have been a little unfocused.
Peter asked "What makes a good blog?", here's what i think:
Firstly, the true beauty of the internet is that enables just about anyone to voice their opinions, loves, dreams, interests and, in fact, their very selves on to a public sphere. But there in lies the issue, the internet is a public area, not a private one. There are private aspects to the internet but if you post a blog, build a website, comment on myspace, discuss on forums these opinions are available for almost all to see. There is an unfathomable amount of content on the internet which means that if someone in our class were to write "I hate Peter Saladino, his opinions are those of a moron" chances are slim that people who actually know me will ever find it unless they happen to google me, but even then there are a few other people with the same name as me who have a greater presence on the internet.
So the internet is big, really big.
But it's still a public place. So to return to my comments in class that a blog should be "interesting" and should try and convey some "ideas" obviously these are fairly broad generalisations for any piece of writing. The girl in the white top (sorry i don't know your name) pulled me up by suggesting that what is interesting to me may not be interesting to someone else and that that is there way of doing their thing, which is totally true.
Did Ann Frank think her diary was going to be a thing of such historical value? Did she think anyone would read it? Did she even think she was going to survive? Probably not. So any account of event or representation of opinion is important, and i believe this.
I don't remember who said this but it's something like "the internet has given the idiots a voice". Harsh words but there is some basic idea i like about it. Writing a blog is not the same as writing in your diary which no one ever sees and is purely for your benefit only. This doesn't mean that people can't post personal diary-type entries, or simple accounts of everyday events but i simply feel that some people posting on the internet have no idea that other people might read this, and they should.
Which brings me to my poorly articulated example of eBay descriptions. Ebay is awesome, it let's anyone sell or buy anything. But they amount of times i have viewed an item where the description either barely describes the article or is so full of spelling and grammatical errors you wonder how they even managed to crawl out of the womb at birth. Did it even click in their head that they are trying to sell something? They should be convincing me to by it to the most truthful degree and the best of their abilities. These people can't really be this simple, surely. I don't know who these people are, perhaps english is their second language, perhaps they were in a hurry but sometimes you almost feel like you know this person has not taken any care in providing this nugget of information to the world.
Perhaps Peter can comment on this but, when we submit essays do we not do as much as we can to ensure that our ideas are coming across? Sometimes there is less time, less inspiration but that's why we have gradings. Peter surely you must have read some essays and simply thought "This person just doesn't care, they're not trying articulate anything" and given it a big fat "F"?
When a news paper makes an error they publish retracting statements, when you submit an ad or obituary or article or opinion to a newspaper someone still reads it and edits it. On the internet, we must exercise as much of this as we can over our own work. The whole world has access to this.
What i want to see on the internet is engagement. Not necessarily high IQs or rocket science or perfection or ideas exactly like my own, I just want my brain to be engaged by something: by an idea, by communication and by thought. I want to know that someone, somewhere is trying to tell the world something.
Sorry for the high level of uni student bullshit, i still don't feel i said this well. Perhaps that is ideal though, that although my words are not perfect, the very fact that someone may read this and have their brain stimulated in some way will make this a successful blog.
Regarding our discussion this morning about mobile phones. After class today i was lying in the grass behind ELT smoking and i had a rhythm stuck in my head. It had slowly crept into my mind over the course of the morning. I play guitar and sometimes ideas for riffs just start playing in my head, then i pick up my guitar and try and make them a reality. Ok so i'm at school, planning on coming back to the labs to do some blogging 'cause my trojan thinkpad decided it need a new battery (my trust is destroyed) and this riff's going over and over in my head and i'm worried i'll forget it by the time i get home. So what i do is i call myself on my phone, it goes straight to voicemail and i hum the tune into my voicemail for when i get home. I felt pretty smart and i had that sweet know-how high when you discover extra use out of something you use everyday until later when i realised that i just spent money on helping out my short term memory. I can't even rememeber a melody for another 3 hours? i instantly thought it was a good idea to spend money to help me out on something so simple? is my brain that clotted with stimuli from the world?
I use facebook and myspace. but i used to use myspace and facebook, before that it was "i use myspace but i just signed up with facebook, y'know... to check it out" etc etc. Now i always check facebook over myspace. I open three taps in firefox: hotmail, facebook, myspace. It used to be hotmail, myspace, facebook.
Why is this interesting? what are you saying??
My identity on the internet is actually more important than i realise. I wouldn't really call my self "self-obsessed", "egotistical" or anything. Certainly a little introverted but i would assume that i am actually fairly humble like a lot of people. I certainly don't spend too much time pimping out or adding to my facebook and myspace accounts. I have done some, yes, but only once or twice etc. In a way these social networking sites are a point for the kids who used to make personal sites, use ICQ, old forums and the like to communicate and create an online identity. Only now it is used to create an identity with a bit of a glow to it, a bit of style. it's not just you, it's you plus one. I can omit or manipulate my image to my liking. Other users have the some power to influence this with comments and photos but when it really comes down to it... i call the shots. I think a sense of power to take control of your identity in a new way is very exciting, with possible ramifications we may never really fathom. It also relates to my previous post regarding how many keys and locks i have on the internet vs in my real life. I don't use second life and i don't think it's for me but i said the same thing about myspace. It also brings up another issue that was in "The Metropolis and Mental Life" (link in previous post) where i think he says something about the citizen of the metropolis must be very self conscious in order to survive in the metropolis. They really must do all they can to be individual and not one of a faceless mass.
I think this ties in with Mark Poster's essay. It may be that we are adjusting ourselves even down to our own self image so that it has value more like a commodity and less like a err... more earthly human being. We even have barcodes for ourselves. Tax file numbers, passport numbers, centrelink numbers, voter registry numbers etc etc are all barcodes of individuals.
So we create little individualised versions of ourselves and our life's works to make is stand out of the crowd, even in the smallest ways. I do agree with the element of memory and biography with this application of new media. Even a website dedicated to someone's holiday to the snow is a form of history, with a first hand account of an event and sometimes photographs.
I can't remember if it was during this lecture that i talked about the Ruth Cracknell Autobiography i read in first year sociology. To a certain extent, i have grown up with Ruth Cracknell. Although i always see her as a skinny, grey-haired pensioner, i've seen many of her works. What i found most interesting about her story was how she grew up, the holidays she went on, the houses lived in, jobs etc. These things add life to what i know of sydney. I spent a lot of time in sydney growing up. My grand parents moved from a farm in Griffith NSW when i was four to a big victorian house in Haberfield, sydney. I spent many weekends and school holidays there as it was so close to where my family and i lived in canberra. There are events in my memory, and, in a way, similar to those of Ruth Cracknell, that i think are equally as interesting as an historical account.
Perhaps we fell the need to display ourselves more because we are being seen more. More closed circuit television, more photos, more photos being distributed, more online videos, more ads telling us how to live, more ads about life that are really just for sugar or petrol or whatever. Perceived personal identity will ALWAYS be important in some way.
---I have just realised that i am mixing weeks three, four and five together in these three blogs i am catching up on. apologies, stick with me.---
I don't mind if an employer googles me or searches for me on facebook, provided they bare in mind that, like who i am in my resume and in my interview, i am someone different when i am in different company and in a different location. If my facebook profile, however, has a photo of me wasted-as-sin punching bongs on the roof at 5AM they should remember that, and i should remember that people will find out about parts of me in some way or another anyway.The internet has merely given us a way to adapt to a more global world. That said i still think we should remember where the "real" world is and where the digital world is. I am firm believer that there are some things on this earth that not only digital technology but also science and mathematics cannot replicate, replace or explain - it provides balance.
And now for something completely different. These three youtube videos recently came back into my life:
